Editorial Cartoon: “Hangry on the Hill”

Dahlgren is a News reporter on the features and student life beat and a contributor on the science and health beat. She is also a fourth-year English student minoring in digital humanities and professional writing.

contact

[email protected]

Comments are supposed to create a forum for thoughtful, respectful community discussion. Please be nice. View our full comments policy here.

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter
Poll

Academic student workers and graduate student researchers represented by the United Auto Workers union recently ended a nearly six-week strike in which they called for better working conditions and equitable wages. The contract stipulates pay increases for all workers – for some, pay increases of up to 80% – as well as anti-harassment policies and increased childcare support. However, the negotiations have struck controversy among some UAW members dissatisfied with the results of the contract. What are your thoughts on this issue? Only the voices of the bargaining team were heard during the negotiation process – the contract is not all-encompassing of student workers and should not have been ratified. The mediation resulted in a realistic contract for academic workers at this time. The agreed-upon result generally covered what the strikers were asking for. I have feelings about this that are not described in the options above. The contract is neither good nor bad and/or this issue does not directly affect me as a student. Submit View results without voting »

Polls Archive
Featured Classifieds

More classifieds »

Editorial Cartoon: “Hangry on the Hill”

By Reese Dahlgren

Posted:

November 6, 2023

3:30 pm

Cartoons

Share

Tweet

Poll

Featured Classifieds

Editorial Cartoon: “Hangry on the Hill”

By Reese Dahlgren

Posted:

November 6, 2023

3:30 pm

Cartoons

Share

Tweet

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

Poll

Featured Classifieds